DVD Review King Kong 2-Disc Special Edition

The Film 9.1/10

In this depression era remake of the beloved creature classic Eccentric filmmaker Carl Denham recruits the out of work vaudevillian performer Ann Darrow to join the production of his latest film, penned by Broadway sensation Jack Driscoll. Unknowing to the cast of the production and the crew of the Venture, the ship transporting them is that Denham plans to film on the mysterious and legendary Skull Island, home to creatures that time forgot, and the titular Kong.

Now that that formality is done with [What reader here would honestly not know what King Kong is about?] Let’s get on with the pros and cons of Jackson’s first post-Lord of the Rings feature. Firstly there’s the issue of length, King Kong weighs in at a whopping 188 min. in length. This makes room for the additional action sequences that Jackson and his boys [and gals] at Weta have added, enhanced, and extended to the story. Certain subplots are also tossed into the mix to flesh out the extraneous red shirts [Mainly the Venture crew]; some work because they stay within their boundaries [Andy Serkis pulling double duty as the ships cook Lumpy and his friendship with Choy] because they don’t have complete scenes and precious running time devoted tot hem, but the relationship between the first mate Mr. Hayes and the ship hand Jimmy falls flat and has no payoff whatsoever.

The film chugs along for the first hour setting up the relationship between Driscoll and Darrow and provides some adequate drama, although it’s hampered by the already mentioned sub-plots and a few creative choices that are better left on the cutting room floor [the dramatic typing of S-K-U-L-L and anytime the scene resembles an A&E crime show dramatization via shaky cam]. The film really picks up speed upon the arrival of the dramatically spelled Island, upon which Ms. Darrow is offered to the native’s god and must be rescued by the ships crew.

Little do they know is that Weta designed the island to be the most ridiculous deathtrap ever conceived and the second act is riddled with relentless action as the crew must survive a barrage of Dinosaurs, monkeys, insects and stuff I can’t even classify. All topped off with a disastrous return to New York and inevitable stand off atop one of its landmarks.

The Look 9/10

Watching the film on a T.V. older than I am, I’m not in that well a position to judge the picture, though with the disc baring no extras and no additional audio tracks, leaving the disc open for the visuals, I’d have to say watching the Venture crew getting thrown up down and all around Skull Island would look damn awesome on a HDTV.

The Sound 8.5/10

Sporting only a 5.1 Dolby Digital mix, DTS fans will be disappointed to know they can’t have Kong’s roar wake up their damn neighbor’s. The mix presented highlights the excellent work done by the technicians who brought 1933 NY and Skull Islands to life, though James Newton Howard delivers a passable, yet fairly repetitive score for the film, one can only wonder how Howard Shore’s original score which was passed on would’ve added to the film.

The Extras 9/10

Introduction by Peter Jackson

Jack-Man introduces you to his monumental undertaking and hopes you don’t choke on your food while viewing the 35 post production entries and additional features

Post Production Diaries [153 min.]

A continuation of the groundbreaking diaries released on Kongisking.net, these diaries cover the Post-Production struggle to get the film released and explores the depths the technicians of Weta have taken to ensure the film lives up to their standards and delivers in every aspect. Departments covered include Editorial, Weta Digital as well as Workshop, the miniatures, Mo-cap, sound, color timing as well as sound mixing.

Skull Island: A Natural History [17 min.]

This featurette details the approach Weta and Jackson took to Skull Island and the evolving of it’s inhabitants [I.E. T-Rex = V-Rex]. Delivered in a faux documentary package, it’s an interesting look at creature design and the numerous creepy crawlies that devour the Ventures shipmates.

Kong’s New York, 1933 [28 min.]

An interesting look at New York during the depression era 1933’s, exploring the rise of Vaudeville culture, the Empire State Building’s creation, and NY’s role as a port of the world as well as various looks at NY culture in that era. It’s a fascinating look at a dark time in America and like Jackson’s other DVD undertakings, showcases not only the how, but why behind the creative process.

Packaging 2/10

The 1-disc artwork gets reduced and framed in a basic black with simply the title and a shiny “2-Disc Special Edition” text, very basic stuff, I would’ve gone with the V-Rex/Kong stare down with Watts in the middle [Which is featured on the rear of the case]

Overall 9/10: A solid presentation of one of the most amazing films of last year with interesting featurettes tossed into the mix, though an inevitable Kong sized edition is highly likely.

Sopranos: The Story So Far

The Sopranos is a Masterpiece. For those in the know, the show has taken quite a different turn this season, perhaps even more radical a direction than the much maligned season 4. Without spoiling too much for those of you who wait for the DVD's, let me tell you why the haters are wrong..this show is amazing.

-For having been off the air for an unbelievably long time, watching the season premiere put me right back in the mix as if I had never left off. Starting with continuing a running story and then taking an extreme turn in the last few minutes, this episode will go down as one of the best since the death of Big Pussy in Season 2 and the death of Ralphie in s4.

-Considering the new direction, the show's writers have a difficult task..these are untreaded waters, and they arguably failed the last time. 3 episodes in, I am more satisfied than I was with any other season. They have managed to keep both interweaving stories interesting and without the usual amount of "mob" stuff, that is quite a bit outside the comfort zone.

-AJ might be coming of age. Though not as much as I had hoped by this point in the series (I had always said that they should be grooming AJ to take over, but he is clearly not at that maturity level), it's good to finally see some progress in this character other than his stupid shenanigans.


We'll see if I am still as satisfied a few more episodes in, but so far this is the ULTIMATE scripted drama on television right now.

FYI...in2TV

Just in case you guys didn't know...Check out AOL's:

http://television.aol.com/in2tv

It is pretty much a huge database of appx. 100 old TV shows...all free!

AOL is promising to add more shows and "other TV-related content that you can't find anywhere else on the web." Titles include: Lois and Clark, Growing Pains, Pinky and the Brain and a whole host of shows I never heard of.

Its done....


Finally, the suspense is over. Unfortunately, the resolution is not a good one, but I think Hurwitz and company gave this show a fitting end.

Read here

Paul Verhoeven week: Starship Troopers (They sucked his brains out!)

Verhoeven’s penchant for combining hyper-violence with social satire is on full display in his interpretation of Starship Troopers, Robert A. Heinlein‘s 1959 novel in which the militaristic leaders of the future combat their intergalactic nemesis dubbed simply “The bugs.”

I have not read the book, neither has Verhoeven who read a few chapters into it and stopped having become both bored and depressed, no doubt the result of which is the tongue in cheek propaganda film structure the story follows, we’re introduced to the conflict via a live report on the siege of Klendathu, home planet of the bugs, it’s here where we also meet our eyes and ears of this future Johnny Rico. Following this we rewind to a year prior in which Rico is shown graduating from school and seeking out a term in the military to become a citizen -- citizenship is required to seek a career or maintain a adequate life in this militaristic world.

Among the ‘90’s youth to join the ranks are Casper Van Dien in fine form before his banishment to television movies, pre-Bond Denise Richard, post-Doogie Neil Patrick Harris and the always welcomed Jake Busey. They’re surrounded by a fine stable of veterans headed up by Michael Ironside who is on full badass display as Rico’s mentor.

Verhoeven, having grown in the anti-militaristic climate of post-WWII Netherlands, relies upon visual imagery to tie the militaristic federation to the fascists of our 20th century and clue in the audience, the biggest statement being Neil Patrick Harris’ Carl Jenkins, who descends from a high school graduate with the unique ability to read minds to a high ranking lieutenant sending thousands of soldiers to their death in the name of victory. Strength through numbers being their game plan, upon the capture of a brain bug believed to be the key, they victoriously claim it afraid, which raises the question of how much alike are the humans and bugs truly? When those afraid of losing their position and power send the mobile infantry, whose been conditioned to not fear death face an enemy who knows nothing of death and serve a higher mind fearful of losing their position, who’s the real enemy?

But hey, it’s Verhoeven, and these potshots at militaristic values and beliefs come with a healthy helping of insect vs. humanoid warfare. Two of the big forays into heavy CG in the mid-90’s were Mars Attacks! and Troopers, and god bless the technology cause it’s used to bring about all kinds of horrific creatures with even more horrific weapons of death. Headshots? Check. Decapitations? More than you need. Bisections? All too many. Humans melting? You bet your ass. Phil Tippet delivers insects by the thousands, from the opening failure on Klendathu to the siege of Rasckaz’s roughnecks in an abandoned outpost, the bug attack fiercely, ferociously and in numbers near the thousands.

The result is pure Verhoeven; ridiculous degrees of violence interrupted by gratuitous nudity, social satire delivered in a deadpan manner via a news network, Michael Ironside firing weapons with very little regard to ammo conservation. All the finer staples of the man dating back to Robocop which was also criticized for it’s Fascistic undertones, but fuck ‘em. Odds are if you hate Verhoeven, you are a fascist.

Colbert's Book Deal!!!


Stephen Colbert from the "The Colbert Report" signed a seven-figure book deal with Warner Bros. to write a non-illustrated book with the same theme as his show: "to change the world one factual error at a time." (Colbert) The book has yet to be titled and is due out September 2007. Colbert intends to write the book without any other collaborators/writers unlike America (The Book) which he co-authored with Jon Stewart.

Justin Fixes the TV Shows: Masters of Horror 1-6


The horror anthology is a lost art. In the late 80s and early 90s these were a dime a dozen; Alfred Hitchcock presents, Tales from the Darkside, Monsters, Are you Afraid of the Dark, and of course Tales from the Crypt plus many more. Since then, it has dropped off significantly. Showtime, last year, looked to revive the genre in a big way by giving the best horror directors of our time free reign, and do a one hour story every week. Carpenter, Dante, Landis and many more. What could possibly go wrong?

Week 1: Don Coscarelli's Incident on and off a Highway Road
Coscarelli, known primarily for Phantasm, but closer to my heart via Bubba Ho-Tep, directs the one true slasher pic of the first 6 episodes, and one of my favorites. We're given two interweaving stories, or rather one main character involved in two interweaving time periods, as a lady, fresh off a car accident, seeks to survive a huge and silent killer. This is the only episode that I can say was truly enhanced by the direction, as Coscarelli chooses to focus on some of the things that in lesser hands could become run of the mill. A great start to the series, even if not the biggest name director by a long shot. 8/10

Week 2: Stuart Gordon's Dreams in the Witch House
This one is mediocre at best, as we are dealing with more of the supernatural side of horror over the exploitation side that I prefer. I'm no fan of Lovecraft, but Gordon's rendition of the classic Re-Animator had me expecting more here. Let me be clear, in the hands of say Romero, this could have been great. A great amount of stuff here, especially the goddamn rat comes off as juvenile and over the top. Dialogue isn't great, and the story is quite run of the mill. There are some great gore effects, but that's about all I have for the positive here. 3/10

Week 3: Tobe Hooper's Dance of the Dead
I'm still not sure what went wrong here. Hooper, known mainly for his overrated Texas Chainsaw Massacre goes a totally different direction here, in a post apocalyptic future where people get their entertainment by artificially reanimated corpses. The problem here is that instead of focusing on that, they focus on a family in this world. Robert Englund is great here, but that is truly the only thing this episode has going for it. Slow paced and not horror by a long shot, this is the low point of the first six eps. 1/10

Week 4: Dario Argento's Jenifer
The director of Suspira is nowhere to be found here, it appears he phoned this one in. None of the touches he is famous for are to be found here. Great gore effects and what could have been a mildly interesting half hour are stretched to a boring and bland hour. Great gore effects and decent acting bring this above Hooper's entry, but not by much, especially considering Argento is probably the director I looked forward to the most (since no one contacted Peter Jackson.) 4/10

Week 5: Joe Dante's Homecoming
Here we are given the most interesting story of all the episodes, but again, I question how this is called horror. A group of dead soldiers from the Iraq war come back to life to cast their vote against the incumbent in a protest to end the war. The episode focuses on a group of advisers to the President, and presents a fascinating view of the world of punditry and smoky room moves. The only thing horrorfying about this though is that there are people like this in politics. Dante's direction doesn't really make a difference, but the story is interesting enough to make this the best so far. 8.5/10

Week 6: Mick Garris' Chocolate
There is no excuse for this one both written and directed by Mick Garris of horror anthology and the Shining fame. The story here, in which a guy has psychic visions of another persons life, and then the other person commits a murder, is nothing more than lifetime movie of the week material. Worse is that the way in which the story is told is setting up for a big twist that never comes. Just awful. 3/10

Alright alright....


Dazed and Confused is finally getting the DVD treatment it deserves via the always wonderful Criterion Collection coming up this June.

Features:
* All new high-definition digital transfer, supervised by Richard Linklater and cinematographer Lee Daniel
* Audio commentary by Linklater
* "Making Dazed," a 50-minute documentary by filmmaker Kahane Corn
* Booklet featuring new essays by film critic Kent Jones, music critic Jim DeRogatis, and author Chuck Klosterman, plus character profiles, and memories of the film from cast and crew
* More than two hours of rare on-set interviews and behind-the-scenes footage featuring cast and crew
* Footage from the 10-year anniversary celebration
* Audition footage
* Deleted Scenes
* Original trailer
* Collectible film poster

Courtesy JOBLO. No word on a price yet. It's certainly not that I am unhappy that this film is finally getting a true SE, but this is a triple dip..and then I look at my DVD rack and there are so many other opportunities.

Our Patron Saint Speaks


His Bruceness, or the Chin if you prefer, has spoken about the upcoming Evil Dead remake. I am not encouraged.

It'll be a whole new story, though. It won't be with Ash... It'll be the evil book, and it'll affect a whole new group of people in a different situation. More like a reinvention. A lot of people, they got really crabby on the Internet when they first heard that type of stuff. But, we would never do anything to insult them. The trick is to take that premise - and we think it's a scary premise - and use some cool modern day FX... so we won't have green garden hoses in the shots. We wanna make a flat out, scary-ass, un-rated horror film.


I'm with Bloody-Disgusting, I hope this one slips through the cracks. If modern day FX means CGI, leave me out.

A friendly reminder

Don't forget, the midseason finale of the Shield tonight.

Paul Verhoeven Week: Robocop (I'd Buy That for a Dollar!)


You probably notice that usually my review columns are called Justin Fixes ____. There is nothing to fix in this movie. Ladies and gentlemen, my ode to the Sci-Fi Action masterpiece, Paul Verhoeven's Robocop.

-The special effects, especially the GORE in this movie is great. The shooting, Clarence's stabbing, the ED-209's mistake. All wonderfully organic and over the top.
-The best set up for a bad guy ever combined with the best death scene in a movie.
-Kurtwood Smith as Clarence Boddicker is the ultimate bad guy. He plays it just right, you get the feeling that this guy is cool, calculating, and bad ass. It almost makes you ignore his future role as Red Foreman.
-The mix of Sci-Fi, action, and satire has yet to be duplicated, even by Verhoeven himself. We're presented a fully thought out world without the useless exposition.
-The one liners don't succumb to the cringe worthy lines brought on later in the decade by the likes of Batman.
-Peter Weller is great here given the difficult material. Given how little we know of him by the time we get to his death, we are still feeling for him. Also well played is the regression into a blank slate and subsequent slide back to his human persona.
-Twin Peaks' Ray Wise as a henchman!
-Toxic Waste guy!
-Tying in the OCP plot to our main story was done pretty masterfully, and even relatively early on.


Whats bad about this movie?>
-The only legitimate way to score this in it's unrated form is through buying the Robocop box set..and that means you have to own parts two and three..or you could pay for the Criterion version on eBay.
-You probably haven't seen this in a long time.

One of my favorite movies of all time, and what I consider to be the reference point for action movies..hold your breath folks and buy this for a dollar. 10/10

Paul "Gore"hoeven Week: Total Recall..."Get your ass to Mars!"


Mars...mass media seems to have some sort of obsession with the red planet. Martians are part of the pop culture and people always talk about scientific achievments in relation to "making it to mars some day" or finding out if there was ever life there. As far as movies about Mars, it's a genre that boasts many stinkers, but there was one movie that combined three of the most unlikely artists possibly since larry, moe, and shemp to create the greatest Mars movie of all time.

Now, I will be the first to admit I have never read a Phillip K Dick novel. Frankly, movies are this century's books and I am perfectly happy wating for every Dick story to be adapted into movie form. There are a ton of "Dick purists" out there though that take issue with every movie from Blade Runner to Minority Report, both of which I enjoy. Total Recall manages to combine very intelligent science fiction with hardcore 1990's rated R violence successfully. Paul Verhoeven practically made a career out of that combination in the late 80s and 90s with movies like Robocop and Starship Troopers and a lot of work in Holland that I never saw but read on the internet also combined violence and intelligent social commentary.

As far as Arnold, what more can you say? He is the American dream. A foreigner with a huge accent defies all odds to become the biggest action star in the world (if he was second to anyone it would be Jackie Chan). In his prime, he chose the perfect projects to advance his career. Total Recall was clearly a big one for him. Verhoeven managed to weave a very, very, very intriguing Phillip K Dick storyline involving buying thoughts and experiences and questioning the reality you are experiencing with massive gun fights, massive gore and violence (verhoeven uses amazingly large squibs and blood packs in his movies, which kicks ass), Arnold one liners, and social commentary. Total Recall is laden with subtle commentary about corruption, greed, social class inequality, etc and not so subtle commentary about how awesome it would be if chicks had 3 tits instead of 2.

In the end though, Verhoeven isn't a stuck up pretentious director and just has fun with this movie, which translates into a great experience for the viewer. I mean who doesnt enjoy it when Arnold leaves the robot controlled "johnnycab" taxi without paying and in response to the objections of the robot Arnie replies with, "Sue me dickhead!". No one involved in this movie has a problem allowing it to be an Arnold project first, which I love. I am sure ultra hard core "Dick"-heads out there balk at the idea of Total Recall being a good science fiction movie just because it stars Arnold Schwarzenegger, well I have one thing to say to them "SCREW YOU BENNY!!!"

Justin Fixes the Movies: The Hills Have Eyes (2006)


I was really hoping that I wouldn't have any fixing to do as I had high hopes for this one. The pedigree of director Aja reeks of a man knocking on the doors of greatness but not quite there. This movie helps him knock even louder, but unfortunately no one is there to answer quite yet.

Let's get to the bitching:
-The first act of the movie is a drag. It takes way too long to get to the action, and what's worse is that instead of warming up to the characters, this first 25 minutes or so had me hating them. I appreciate that (almost) all of the characters were fleshed out enough that I hated them for different reasons, but there had to have been a better way to set up the movie. On a major major plus, it says a lot for the second and third act that even though I hated these characters, the bad guys were brutal enough that I still felt for the family.
-Considering the source material, Aja largely jettisons the grindhouse exploitation feel he seemingly mastered in High Tension. This isn't necessarily a negative, just a bit jarring when going in with a head of expectations. Having thought about it, the movie's pacing could have possibly been better served with the grindhouse feel.
-A few small rewrites could have easily jettisoned the character lapses in logic. It is probable that given the amount of stress the family is under that they aren't thinking clearly. That, however, is no excuse for two separate occasions that come to mind that I won't spoil, but will jump out at you when you watch.
-Sure there was some nuke testing and sure these people are pretty pissed about this..but the motives behind their actions still don't seem fully realized. As I see it, at one point in the movie, we were supposed to wonder who the monster really is, but unlike the Devil's Rejects, we are given no reason at all to feel for the mutants. In other words, at no time in the movie did it seem as if the family was doing any more than defending themselves. That is perfectly fine and good, except I don't think it was the intent.
-The mutants are difficult to take seriously when they look that much like the Toxic Avenger.


The good:
-The violence is absolutely unrelenting and jarring.
-The gore, courtesy KNB, is done extremely well while not going over the top. Not that over the top is a bad thing.
-The acting is passable. The writing is rather good in that it never took me out of the movie. Nothing excellent.
-The movie is enjoyable enough to own. It might not make you think too much, but that doesn't have to be a bad thing.
-Again, the mutants here are so brutal that you are never rooting for them. Their actions had me, an old horror vet, squirming at some time. I can't think of a movie that has put me in that situation..ever. The trailer raid is damn near perfect.

Overall I have no problem recommending this great, not perfect, horror flick to genre fans, especially fans of either the source material or High Tension. Aja had the perfect flick in High Tension and then dropped the ball on the ending. He had the perfect material here and maybe tried to stretch his boundaries when he didn't need to. I know the score here is probably going to seem much higher than my review would lead you to believe, but to be totally honest, most of the flaws here are really nitpicking. 8.8/10

Prison Break is back!

Don't forget folks, Prison Break returns at 8 on Fox tonight. Excellent move pairing it with 24. Enjoy the best new show of this season, even if it is a little uneven. i

Justin Fixes the Movies: V for Vendetta


This review will be the third review of this movie on the site. Why is this one unique? Unlike Faze and Darth, I am not familiar with the source material and am a fairly polarized politically minded person. From my perspective, this is not only the best movie so far this year, but one of the most important flicks to come out of Hollywood in a while. Let's discuss why it is one shade away from greatness.

The Good:
-The source material must have been great. We have a coherent story with great setup and characterizations.
-Acting is top notch, especially for Hugo Weaving. Think about how difficult it would be to convey emotion in a movie. Now think about how to do that if you are hidden behind a mask for the entire duration. Also notice how good Portman is when she is given real material.
-Style and direction, although borrowing from the Wachowskis for a few sequences, never override the movie, as you feel you are part of a story more than the spectacle around it.
-Hmm, there may or may not be a few parallels to our current situation, along with a few not so subtle digs at the American way. I hope that people come out of this movie thinking.
-It was literally 3 minutes in when this movie grabbed me, and didn't let go until the credits rolled.
-I love the goddamn posters for this movie.

The Bad:
- After a great no-modern rock soundtrack throughout the whole movie, why bring out the stones for the credits?
-This may be a tad convoluted throughout the middle for your average moviegoer.
-The Wachowskiesque action sequence was a little out of place, though fitting. My biggest qualm with it was the CGI blood effects. Call me old fashioned, but I'd have rather seen some organic stuff here, and for what it was, I don't think it would have been that difficult to pull off.
-I wonder if it could have been shorter..not that I was bored or feeling that this was too long during the movie, just looking back, maybe a few things could have been trimmed here or there.
-What's with the overblown domino scene? This is the only thing that kinda kicked me and reminded me that I was watching a comic book adaptation.

Overall, an excellent movie and as close to perfect as it has been in a very long time. I will certainly buy this DVD and check out the source material. Don't go in thinking you are in for an action movie, and don't go in with your brain turned off and I will guarantee you a great time.

9.8/10

Stealing Cable presents: Paul Verhoeven week!


The sequel to Paul Verhoeven's Basic Instinct hits the big screen very shortly, and while Verhoeven has nothing at all to do with it, any excuse to write about the man and his work is a good excuse. Coming this week you'll have gushing love letters from most of the Stealing Cable staff to such classics as Robocop, Total Recall, Basic Instinct and Starship Troopers. You might even hear about Hollow Man, Showgirls, and the countless (4 sequels + 2 TV Series + 1 Canadian series) and mostly horrible spawn of his work too. Enjoy our tribute to the lost world of organic gore, giant squib packs, and gratuitous nudity all week long.

The Office on over the summer

NBC will be airing 10 brand new stand alone episodes of "The Office" titled "Who stole $3,000?" Angela, Brian and Oscar (the accounting staff) will try to solve the mystery with appearances from Dwight and other regulars. These web episodes will be available on nbc.com.

26 new episodes of Futurama.

UPDATE: Billy West has since said that he had made a [no doubt huge] mistake, stating that 26 episodes of the sorely missed show are not in the cards and that the original plan of Straight to DVD movies is what fans are getting.

According to Billy West [Voice of the main character, Phillip J. Fry] Futurama is set to return to television upon the finalization of a deal that would result in 26 new episodes of the space-comedy birthed from the warped imaginations of Matt Groening and Davis X. Cohen.
“I'm this close to selling my show ''Billy Bastard - Amateur Human Being', and the other good news is that they're doing 26 new episodes of 'Futurama'' for TV and we're hammering out the deal now. The original plan was to have the DVD's first but that's no longer the case. I'm totally jammed dude.”

The full post can be found here. I for one can't wait to see the continuing adventures of the planet express crew. Futurama was, in this geeks opinion, better than anything Fox had to offer at the time [Yeah, that includes Family Guy].

No word on whether the show will return on FOX or perhaps migrate to the Cartoon Network where it gained a loyal following of fans after it's cancellation.

Source: Aint It Cool News

V for Vendetta...An Alan Moore translation that works?


The short answer is yes. The long answer is yessssss. For the many uninitiated out there, Alan Moore is probably the best working comic book writer of the past 20 years. He does everything from super heroes to political drama. V for Vendetta lands somewhere in between. The graphic novel itself is at times a difficult read because its just so "heady" for lack of a better word. It really makes you think about the deeper subtext behind the main story.

As for the movie, let me just start out by saying it only increases my reverance for Alan Moore's work. The man is a visionary in the way Huxley or Orwell are/will be. His ultra-conservative/fascist England of the late 1990's (the near future to Moore and his co-writer/artist David Lloyd when writing the book in the early 80s) is such a relevant concept today. His extreme take on big government remind the sane living in America and across this world that government can be a dangerous thing if the people its govern stop thinking for themselves. The movie does a really great job of recapturing that sense from the graphic novel.

One distinction that is important to make is that the Wachowski's and James McTiegue really did very little to make this story more "current" besides throwing in Islamic extremism as the "enemy" of the day versus Soviets/Communists in the graphic novel. The fox news like "voice of england" is a slightly more exaggerated version of the "voice" in the novel. The intrusiveness of the government as far as surveillance was in the novel. The damning portrayal of the role the Church plays in government was straight form the novel as well...are all these things sounding familiar? The art design and many scenes in the movie are pretty much lifted directly from comic panels.

No matter what Mr. Moore says (he has gone on record as not caring for this adaptation and has taken his name off the project) this is very much his story, so the only credit that should go to the Wachowski's and McTiegue is for the final action scene (really the only one too) and adapting the novel into 2 and a half hour movie. The graphic novel itself spent a ton more time fleshing out the secondary characters, which made the whole effort feel more well rounded and satisfying, while the movie tended to drag a bit halfway through because they tried to force in all the relevant plot points of the novel at the expense of character development.

All in all, it was a pretty impressive effort. I think those unfamiliar with the comic book will probably be very surprised by this movie, which upon superficial could be seen as making a hero out of a terrorist. It really is far deeper than that. Even though Alan Moore has basically given up on Hollywood and will most likely take his name off any project of his that goes to screens, I think he should be happy to know that someone got it pretty close to right.

Now Watchmen is another story...I don't think that can ever be done right in movie form. Read it and you will figure out why quite quickly.

Sarah's Recommendations: Lost in Translation


Overview: An American actor, Bob Harris, on the brink of a mid-life crisis comes to Tokyo to film TV commercials, where he runs into Charlotte, a newlywed college graduate. They both seem to have one thing in common: their sad lonely desperation to feel the presence of another human.

Good: The cinematographer, Lance Acord, did an incredible job capturing Japan in all of its nuances and quirks. I felt like much of the movie's excellence was due to his visual work. Coppola is successful at superficially introducing us to the lives of these characters, which is the feel she wanted to elicit. And I appreciated how she kept the love between the two characters very simple and pure, as if they were in each other's lives for this brief 1 week period to bring some joy and then never see each other again. It was not out of lust but out of a need to reexamine their own lives and come to a realization of how to translate their own existence in life.

Bad: Albeit the movie was visually appealing and the acting was pretty good, this was not enough to keep my attention. It was pretty boring. "Lost in Translation" is the type of movie you would probably have to watch again to realize that there was no meaning you were supposed to grasp from it, it was just about two people needing to rejuvenate their mundane existence and the audience is left with a feeling of uncertainty as to the characters ever achieveing that awakening. I would not watch it again so I guess there goes that. It took a good 30 mins. before I could pseudo pay attention to it and even then, the writing, the acting, the visual presence, and the directing did not keep my attention.

Recommendation: I would not watch it again. And I can only half (5/10) recommend that you watch it a first time even with all the accolades it received.

Sarah's Recommendation: We already know it's bad but I like to beat a dead horse...Gigli


Overview: This flick centers around a "down on his luck" thug who falls in love with his lesbian crime partner.

Good: Ben Affleck's face, not his acting, just his face.

Bad: Wow. What a horrible horrible film. Ben Affleck plays Larry Gigli, a thug who kidnaps a mentally handicapped kid and holds him for ransom from his brother, a lawyer who has the authority to drop charges on some case his mob boss is invovled in. Jennifer Lopez plays the female thug who his sent by the mob boss to watch over Larry, making sure he doesn't screw up. So the two of them live together and Larry starts falling for Ricki (J.Lo) but he finds out she is a lesbian. This was so badly written that I am going to stop writing about what happened in it because it is THAT ridiculous. I only watched it because I had nothing better to do on my 7 hour plane ride. I really think the movie was a just a ploy to get people into the theaters to watch Bennifer make out on screen since the public cared so much to see them on newsstands. What a waste of Al Pacino, Christopher Walken and Martin Brest (director of Scent of a Woman, Midnight Run and Beverly Hills Cop).

Recommendation: soooo bad. Don't watch it and I am guessing you probably weren't planning on it anyway.

Snakes on a Plane trailer rattles onto net

This summer the return of Superman, the unveiling of Cars and the final Stand of the X-men will all play prelude to the cinematic mastery of Snakes on a Plane, which we all know opens August 18th and stars Samuel L. Jackson. All the films mentioned above have stayed outside of this release date, no doubt out of respect, and when you view this trailer, surely you'll be among the many, no doubt dozens of people nationwide to fly the slithery skies that day.

V For Victorious

V For Vendetta

Not being a politically driven fellow, you’ll have to excuse me when I sidestep the whole parallels between the government presented in V For Vendetta and the current administration controlling the U.S. What I will say is that those Alan Moore fans will be relieved to know the film packs as much bite as it’s paperbacked source. Yes, some events have been altered and restructured and shifted about, but even Sin City with all its touted faithfulness dropped some pages and panels for the sake of cinema.

20 years into the future, the government is overtaken by a fascist regime. Led by Adam Sutler [Hellboy’s John Hurt], the regime has put an end to free thought and has done away with people of different race and sexuality. Officers known as fingermen roam the streets at night while curfew is in effect. It is here we are introduced to Natalie Portman’s Evey and V, a man of ideas who plots to remove those in power [Played with delight by Hugo Weaving of The Matrix and Lord of the Ring’s Trilogy]. Upon rescuing Evey from a fate far worse then death, their destinies are intertwined as V’s Vendetta of vengeance against government begins.

Much credit must be given to Hugo Weaving’s interpretation of V. From his body language to his manner of speech, Weaving breathes much life into the grinning visage of Guy Fawkes. It’s unthinkable that any other actor could have pulled off a character this abstract [Weaving replaced James Purefoy sometime into production]. Weaving walks a fine line alternating between menace and cheeriness, sometimes utilizing both, his performance is the highlight of the film.

The character of Evey and her journey has been retooled from the graphic novel, where she was held captive in V’s lair. Portman’s Evey separates herself from V’ a number of times during the film, at one point finding safe hiding in the home of a friend who himself has something to hide from the government. A particularly memorable sequence is Evey’s imprisonment as she’s interrogated for the whereabouts of V. Perhaps the most faithful section of the film, retaining the original ideas of individual freedom and holding onto them at all costs.

McTeigue, a first time director aided by second unit work by the Wachowski Bros. [though you’d think they had more than a small part in constructing this flick] exhibits a sure hand, particularly a scene in which Evey wakes up in V’s lair and is treated to breakfast and the already mentioned torture sequence in which all manner of hope is drained from Portman and her surroundings, it certainly doesn’t hurt that he’s aided by an ensemble cast of Britain’s finest [Stephen Fry, Stephen Rea, Roger Allam]

Whether or not the film will spark debate in the media is still questionable, what’s not is the fine amount of work that has gone into constructing this cinematic rendition of V For Vendetta, a well crafted and solid debut for McTeigue and an “action” film that like the Wachowski’s previous efforts, challenges you to think as well as enjoy the entertainment.

8.3/10

Monday and beyond

My personal business ends Monday and so begins the return of my regular blogging. Thank you to Faze and Sarah for holding the place down for the last few weeks, and hopefully you'll hear from our as yet silent other writers very shortly. I have plenty of stuff in the works as far as blog content, and I am putting together material for a podcast as well. Coming next week on Stealing Cable:

You'll have my reviews of The Hills Have Eyes, V for Vendetta, The Shield Season 5.1, and Ghost Recon 360. Also look for Classic reviews in the vein of the Cube Trilogy, and a special Paul Verhoeven appreciation week, where we look at all of his works back to and including Robocop, Total Recall, Basic Instict, Starship Troopers, and possibly even Showgirls. We'll sort through the mess of available dvd releases for those movies and declare which version you should be looking for, as well as much more.

Looking further down the pike, we will take a look at the ad campaigns for this month's huge slate of movies and discuss how they have affected their performance (hint: they totally dropped the ball for the Hills Have Eyes), a look at how Howard Stern TV is coming along, and a weeklong tribute to splatter movies in anticipation of James Gunn's Slither.

Looking for the best show on tv?

Look no further than the Shield on FX, Tuesdays at 10 pm.

I will have more in depth thoughts on this landmark season after it ends next week, but it has already earned itself a spot in the "top tv shows of all time" list just due to its achievement in the field of excellence. The show refuses to sit on its laurels and just coast. It gets better with each episode.

For the uninitiated out there, pick up season 1 on DVD right now. If you aren't hooked by the end of episode 1, I will give you 5 dollars.*

*offer not valid because Faze is a liar*

March Madness


After what has seemed like an infinitely long lull in anything entertaining, March is gearing up to be one of those months that we stealing cablites treasure.

Movies in a big big way..though starting slowly with the unapologetically awful Ultraviolet (faze's review here), continues on with Alejandro Aja's remake of the Hills Have Eyes, Wachowski Bros' V for Vendetta, and James Gunn's Slither, all of which have some pretty great buzz.

In the TV world, we are graced with the return of Veronica Mars, Prison Break and of course the biggie, The Sopranos. Also (mid)season finale coming for the Shield.

On DVD we await the release of Good Night and Good Luck as well as A History of Violence, both academy nominees..and of course Peter Jackson's King Kong bringing up the rear.

With a lineup that could be matched only by April, this is looking to be a return to form and a huge month for the entertainment-nerd. Look for reviews and discussion of all of this and everything else that we find interesting right here.

End of an Era...Tivo hits delete on Lifetime Subscription

So, tivo finally announced their new pricing plans. They are now bundling service plans with the boxes rather than doing it separately like they used to. Starting next week you buy a tivo box with a subscription plan (you can either pay monthly for 1,2, or 3 years, or prepay for the entire duration of the plan).
The price for a TiVo box and a one-year service commitment is $19.95 a
month or $224 prepaid
The price for a TiVo box and a two-year service commitment is $18.95 a
month or $369 prepaid
The price for a TiVo box and a three-year service commitment is $16.95 a
month or $469 prepaid
There is an obvious price increase here and given that the previous life time subscription was just 300 dollars (which paid for itself if you held on to the tivo for more than a year and a half) it looks like the comapny is doing what it can to increase revenue. I love Tivo's software, but there hardware plans are just getting too expensive. Cable and satellite companies practically give away their DVRs...now if Tivo only made bigger deals with companies besides Comcast and was able to hold onto their DirecTV deal hings might have been different.

Justin Fixes the TV Shows: Sons and Daughters

Like most TV nerds, I was sucked into the marketing for Sons and Daughters. I've made a huge mistake.

Here goes:
-Why ape the one thing that sunk another show: Arrested Development's advertising strategy. All this did was get fans of AD to tune in..and if they are anything like me, they weren't impressed. Marketing can only get you so far.
-I am all for fleshing out characters, but there are just way too many here too, and they for the most part seem to have equal weight. Focus more on fewer characters, and perhaps think about making them likeable. The interviews all claim that this show would be more humane and identifiable than AD, but right now there are too many people to give a shit about any one of them.
-Three laughs. That was it during the entire hour for me, 2 coming from the glassed teen chick and one from the little girl, all three of which I knew were coming from their ad campaign. You have an identity crisis..are you going to try to balance comedy and drama like Scrubs? More like Desperate Housewives? or are you going to try to be balls out like AD? Decide and stick with it.


Overall, this is head and shoulders above most network sitcoms, but that isn't saying much. Given it's timeslot competition of Scrubs, I can not recommend this show. I do wish it the best and hope that ABC gives it time to get some footing and hopefully this show, which does have some potential, could get better.

TiVo Mobile


Verizon Wireless customers who have TiVo will be able to access their on-the-go tv schedules on their cell phones early this summer. This is the latest innovative idea from TiVo to differentiate itself in the market.

"TiVo isn't just about a great way to watch television but it's also about a great way to manage your TV life, and to do that, we realize TiVo can't be isolated. It has to be integrated with all these other digital devices in people's lives," TiVo CEO Tom Rogers said in an interview.

Sons and Daughters

We've all seen the ads for ABC'S improv sitcom "Sons and Daughters." They, for whatever reason, are trying to evoke Arrested Development. Outside of how little sense that strategy makes, buzz for this one is moderately good, so I will be checking it out (via DVR while watching Scrubs live) at 9pm this evening, and you probably should too. Reactions later this evening.

Justin Fixes Harry Potter and the Goblet of Shit

..well honestly thats a bit harsh. Allow me to backtrack.


Do you read the books? Better question. Did you read the books before the movies were announced? Then you will probably be bored here. Whats wrong?

-We're frickin four years in..we don't need to be amazed by the magic..and Harry certainly doesn't need to be constantly amazed by the magic.
-I fault the source material for being a little too descriptive and long winded, but the movie doesn't have to follow. Thats why it's an adaptation..you can take a little creative liscense and leave some stuff out instead.
-are the Death Eaters just the klan? Because those guys are laughable.
-The biggest problem with this, and every HP movie, is that the people involved do so little to adapt to film that sitting through this and knowing what is coming up a complete chore. It's as if you have already seen the movie before you watch it.

On a technical level, acting, directing, and everything else is good to go. The biggest plus this series has is it's ability to find actors that fit the roles perfectly. The source material isn't as compelling as let's say LOTR to make this series one to keep coming back to. I can't fault this for being a bad movie, and if this is the only way you know the series, you will probably be sufficiently entertained. Otherwise, I can't recommend this. The wow factor of seeing how they could possibly translate this into a movie is about all it has going for it. 7.8/10

Finally a good movie (Running Scared)


Short review:Of course no one saw this movie in theaters, but I think I have found an future cult classic...starring Paul walker. I am as surprised as you are. Running Scared is one of the more gritty and entertaining crime/mob dramas to come out in a long while.

Long review:I don't know what the deal is with Hollywood and crime stories, but they just don't do them well anymore. I mean the early 90s had some fantastic stories about criminals like Heat, Goodfellas, Casino, Usual Suspects, Donnie Brasco, etc. Now the mob movies we have to watch are Analyze This and The Whole Nine Yards...and their sequels. Anyway, I hope Wayne Kramer gets more work because his direction and writing in this movie is very good.

Some other critic already described this movie as sort of an urban fairy tale, and while I wouldnt have thought of that myself, its probably the best way to describe it. It all centers around Paul Walker's character who is muscle for the mob and generally handles gun disposal after they have been used. We see one particular gun involved in a shoot out between dirty cops, jamaican drug dealers, and the mobsters. Once this gun is put in Walker's hands for disposal the ride begins. The gun is the driving force of the movie and it passes from one wild character to the next. Walker's neighbor, a russian family, lights the fuse when the russian kid finds the gun, uses it on his john wayne obsessed abusive meth head dad. From there, the russian mob, the italian mob, mexican gangsters, pimps, child pornographers (in a super creepy part of the movie), and the cops become links in a chain following the path of the gun in question.

The plot of the movie is almost just a vehicle moving you from one wild character to the next, sort of like a Coen Brothers movie. You could percieve the massive coincedence that links all these characters together as a weakness of the movie. I know there were people in the theater saying "hey thats just unrealistic that those two would meet up!". But the characters were so intersting that the journey that got you there didnt matter.

I think the biggest surprise is the amount of violence in this movie and Paul Walker's performance (its a good performance). You actually forget its Paul Walker playing a role, very unlike the fast and the furious movies where its more "oh its Paul Walker trying to act again". The russian kid in the movie played by Cameron Bright (who was also in ultraviolet *shudder*) does a great job too. If you arent grossed out by violence and cursing that harkens back to the 70s and 80s era rated R movies, I think there is a lot to like in this movie. I also gotta give kudos to Kramer's directing style. Good use of slo-mo, good use of instant replay type moments, and great scenery. He uses clever editing involving the visual retelling of events and displacement of events in the timeline of the movie in a way that doesnt come off as Tarantino-esque. It just comes off as fun and entertaining. Its unfortunate that this movie isn't doing well in the box office because I am tired of these "soft" R-rated movies that have been populating the theaters. You gotta go all the way (like this movie) or not at all.

Wimmer's Sophomore Slump (An Ultraviolet Bashing)


I am guilty of believing in a false movie prohpet, and his name is Kurt Wimmer. After a career made up of script doctoring and writing Brian Bosworth movies, he got a chance to make a film combining his love for martial arts and action movies. Equilibrium starring Christian Bale was the result, a new age classic in my opinion. The thing that got me excited about Wimmer was his eye for action. He obviously revered the Golden Harvest Sammo Hung/Jackie Chan era martial arts movies and did not fall into the habit of cutting up all his fight scenes making them incomprehensible to the viewer. And he also did something no one expected, brought originality to the movies!!?? Gun-kata was a great little concept that could only exist in movies and was executed brilliantly. The script was pedestrian, but serviceable and made general sense. The movie was full of great actors...most notable Bale who was still a relative unknown at the time. The movie became a huge internet cult sensation and really built up the buzz over his second project "Ultraviolet"

Yeesh. Thats what I thought coming out of the theater today. My next thought was, "what have you done with the real kurt wimmer". The script is terrible...i mean Carnosaur 3 on the sci fi channel terrible. The dialogue is pure utter shit and literally makes you laugh out loud. The storyline is as derivative as they come. The CGI is piss poor, yet Wimmer chose to do an entire 5 minute vehicular chase scene with this same CGI. But the thing that really pisses me off is the action. It literally consisted of Milla Jovovich dancing around and fake hurting people and then having them all fall down. Maybe that had to do with the rating being brought down to pg-13 from R thanks to studio urging, but seriously the studio could not have made this any worse than it already was.

Extreme language to follow: Now, Mr. Wimmer has done almost no press for this movie. I am sure he is waiting to play the "studio interference" card on this one. FUCK THAT and FUCK YOU wimmer. This is all on your shoulders. It was utter shit and you are totally responsible for it. Milla can't be blamed because she has been serviceable in other tough girl roles. You wrote this shit and you directed it. You made the genius decision of having the camera track 19 times between the shades of violet and her soon to be aggressors. You made the decision of having the camera track from a guy's ear to the barrell of a gun!? You made the fucking decision of having action scenes take place OFF CAMERA. WE LIKE YOU BECAUSE WE THOUGHT YOU COULD DIRECT ACTION. Not because you are some sort of auteur. The action that made it onscreen is a pile of junk. You made the decision of shooting the final fight scene IN THE FUCKING DARK lit only by flaming swords?! FUCKING IDIOCY. Fuck you for making me watch that shit and I hope you never fucking work again.

Feeling Hot Hot Hot!!! (An Infernal Affairs Review)


Short Version:A very smartly written, well made Hong Kong Triad crime drama. Sure its a crowded genre, but this movie takes some interesting twists along the way and manages to keep the audience on its toes. Some awkward choices in editing and ambiguous/dangling story points do exist, but its a high class movie with great acting. I am sure it will be leaps and bounds better than the Scorcese remake.

Longer and more entertaining version: Ah the Hong Kong crime drama, this genre has been done to death since John Woo ripped through it with pistols akimbo in the late 80s and early 90s. Before you go on, if you haven't seen A Better Tomorrow 1 and 2, The Killer, and/or Hard Boiled I highly suggest you go watch those right now and not bother with this movie yet.

Andrew Lau (no relation to the actor in the movie Andy Lau) and his co-director Alan Mak managed to make an original triad gangster drama in a field of copycats. The basic core of the movie is relatively clever. The triads place several young gangsters with clean records in the police academy and expect them to be their eyes and ears in the police force. Andy Lau's character, Ming, is followed from the initial infiltration of the police academy to the cusp of a new high ranking position and a new life with his soon to be wife (who doesn't know who he is). At the same time, Tony Leung's character, Yan, is a hot shot police academy rookie and put in the undercover program very early and has been feeding information to the chief of police for the past 10 years. The story of both characters are told through flashbacks, which for some jarring reason use totally different actors to play the "young" versions of both characters.

At first, the movie literally feels like Hard Boiled just without all the action. Tony Leung is practically playing the same character he did in Hard Boiled. They even managed to steal/do an homage to a scene in Hard Boiled involving a gift from the chief of police to the long undercover cop on his birthday. The movie really gets interesting because of Andy Lau's gangster rising up the ranks and getting actual power in the police force and watching the choices he makes given this new power.

On the whole, the movie is wonderfully shot and makes minimal use of slo-mo. There are a lot of great rooftop shots of the city of Hong Kong. The acting is second to none. Tony Leung has been consistently putting in A+ performances in hong kong in a variety of genres. You can't even find an appropriate comparison to a Hollywood actor as far as versatility and dependability of performance. Andy Lau really has the meatiest role in the movie though and does wonders with it. I really don't want to delve to much into the plot because seeing it develop and how the characters react to it is half the fun of the movie.

In the next few months, Scorcese's remake of this movie, "The Departed", will be hitting with a pretty huge cast (Dicaprio, Wahlberg, Damon, and Jack Nicholson to name a few). He has chosen to set it in Boston with the Irish mob and the police force. Irish Mob? Why the hell would I want to see a Scorcese gangster flick with an IRISH MOB? Anyway, I am sure it will be far below the standard set by the Hong Kong version, but will get blown by all the critics because its a Scorcese film.

Watch the Hong Kong version and enjoy yourself. There are 2 sequels out, which arent as good apparently, but that is another review.

Sarah's Recommendations: Hustle and Flow


Overview: "Hustle and Flow" is an unequivocally optimistic story about a pimp who dares to dream in an environment where a sense of helplessness is the norm. Terrence Howard plays Dejay, the struggling drug dealer and seller of his female escorts. Through his drive to get his demos heard, the audience meets a whole host of characters with the same passion to imagine different lives for themselves, but since these different lives are intangible, they cannot fathom them. They just continue to dream for more than what they were born into.

Good: Terrence Howard gave a magnetic performance as Dejay. Howard made the audience feel for Dejay, inspite of his drug dealing and pimpin' ways. Kudos on the Oscar nod. Well-deserved. Sidenote-Howard is studying to get his Master's in Chemical Engineering. Wow, the brother is cute and DEEP.

The characters were all well-defined and we were able to see more than the stereotypical ghetto. I felt like I could get under their skin and almost understand their reality, it was a situation between entrapment in a cycle and trying to break it.

Bad: The movie was pretty self-conscious, like it wanted to be that rising from the streets (8-Mile) type of flick. Even though the characters were well-defined, I would have appreciated more of a struggle because realistically, this one-in-a-million opportunity is just that, one in a million. Making-it-big is not as easy as the movie made it seem, and I am sure a lot of that had to do with the pacing of the film and the limited time in which certain motifs were allowed to develop. The creation of the first demo tape took what seemed liked 5 mins. and its success on the radio had the same time allotment.

Recommendation: I say, watch it. It was pretty good. If you are looking for social commentary on pimps and hoes, look again. This movie is about having faith in a dream you know is bigger than yourself and all the insecurities that entails. I can appreciate it for telling me that.

No Ultraviolet for me

Well I usually am not swayed by reviews, but the downright Uwe Bollian 4% (what the hell, Wimmer?) on Rotten Tomatoes for Wimmer's Ultraviolet is going to keep me out of theaters this weekend. Fear not, however because this is an unusually good month, with next week's Hills Have Eyes remake from High Tension (which kicks ass) director Alejandro Aja, and the following week we have V for Vendetta, from some guys whos last movie(s) were the Matrix(es). Both actually have surprisingly high scores on RT right now, especially HHE, so consider my interest piqued. Also this coming week you will have my fixing of the fourth Harry Potter flick and an all important review of ABC's midseason (and quite strangely Arrested Developmenty looking) Sons and Daughters, as well as all the news thats important to me and my massive staff.

The Office

I will continue to be here on a limited role for the next week or so while I take care of some business here, but checking in, I wanted to give my full endorsement to the US Office. I had watched the pilot when it aired and wasn't very impressed, but I gave the entire series a shot (Via Itunes) and this is really a great example for sticking with something. A mediocore to slightly above average first season really comes into it's own in the excellent second season, placing it in the elite club of good sitcoms. Watch this, do what you have to do to catch up, excellent shit.

Tivo helps parents

Wow, what a let down in the world of tech news this week. First Apple just releases a friggin leather case for the ipod and now Tivo announces better parental control? What an underwhelming past few days.

Oh well, here's to hoping Ultraviolet is good. I rewatched Equilibrium tonight and it is still an amazingly good movie. I actually forgot how many recognizable actors are in it. You know anything with Sean Bean in it has to be good! For those who haven't seen it, definitely give it a shot and support Ultraviolet and Kurt Wimmer this weekend.

Tivo-lution


So, Tivo is making a big announcement tomorrow. Analysts have been predicting the fall of this company for years now, and the fact that Tivo is still around and has a very devoted fan base speaks volumes about its service. Not only is it the most functional DVR out there (they do have the most experience with it, since they practically invented it), but the customer service is second to none. I hope this deal is something bigger than just new subscription plans, which is what most people are guessing it will be. That or the already revealed series 3 box being brought to market. What I want to hear is that the Netflix deal goes into effect sooner rather than later. For those who don't know, the Netflix deal would in essence allow Tivo and Netflix users to combine both services. You schedule movies to rent on your netflix que...your Tivo downloads digital copies of these movies over night without you ever knowing, and then the movie (dvd quality of course) sits on your hard drive until it has been watched and then automatically deletes itself. I am sure the MPAA would have issues with this given the fact that the Tivo community loves to hack everything, but it would give Tivo an edge in the already overcrowded DVR market. This wouldnt be video on demand or pay per view or anything. It would be bringing the rental store to you through broadband with no need for snail mail.